Capital One Bank (Canada Branch) v. Hussey, (June 26, 2012), Lindsay 31-12 (ONSC Div. Ct.)

Capital One (Canada Branch) v Larry Richard Hussey and Nancy Louise Hussey

Divisional Court File No. 31-12

Heard on June 26, 2012

 

ONTARIO

DIVISIONAL COURT, SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

 

 

CAPITAL ONE BANK (CANADA BRANCH)

Plaintiff

(Appeallant)

 

- and - 

 

LARRY RICHARD HUSSEY and NANCY LOUISE HUSSEY

Defendants

(Respondents)

 

ORDER

 

THIS APPEAL by the plaintiff Capital One Bank (Canada Branch) for an order varying the judgment of Selbie, D.J. dated February 14, 2012 by changing the post-judgment interest awarded from the Courts of Justice Act rate to the contractual rate of 21.7 percent per annum was heard this day at Lindsay

 

ON READING the Appellant's Factum, Appeal Book and Compendium, and Book of Authorities, and on hearing the submissions of counsel for the appellant, no one appearing for the respondents,

 

  1. THIS COURT ORDERS that the appeal is allowed.  The judgment of Selbie, D.J. in favour of the plaintiff for $6,664.75, costs of $335.00 and post-judgment interest at the Courts of Justice Act rate from February 14, 2012 is set aside.  Judgment shall issue for $6,664.75, costs of $335.00 and post-judgment interest at the contractual rate of 21.7 percent per annum from February 14, 2012.

  2. At the request of the appellant there is no order as to costs of this appeal.

 

The Honourable Drew S. Gunsolus

 

Transcribed by Michael Hui on Septmeber 22, 2015.  Original available below.

Capital One Bank v. Hussey

The Order of Justice Gunsoles arising from the appeal of the Small Claims Court decision in Capital One Bank (Canada Branch) v. Hussey

Contingency based collection means that payment for our work is contingent upon our success. If we are unsuccessful in our attempts to collect, you pay no fee.

Testimonials

When Todd approached me, I offered him a trial as one of the firms we used. A year into the scheduled 18-month pilot, he had delivered impressive results. His firm was collecting two to three times as much as the average of the other four law firms we used in Ontario. We dismissed the lowest performing law firm, giving all its business to Todd’s firm. At the end of the 18 months, we boosted Christensen Law Firm’s share. . . to 80 percent, the maximum we will allow.

- Wayne McLeish,B.A., LL.B, President & CEO, DRN Commerce (now FCT Default Solutions)