Capital One Bank (Canada Branch) v. Hussey, (June 26, 2012), Lindsay 31-12 (ONSC Div. Ct.)

Capital One (Canada Branch) v Larry Richard Hussey and Nancy Louise Hussey

Divisional Court File No. 31-12

Heard on June 26, 2012










- and - 








THIS APPEAL by the plaintiff Capital One Bank (Canada Branch) for an order varying the judgment of Selbie, D.J. dated February 14, 2012 by changing the post-judgment interest awarded from the Courts of Justice Act rate to the contractual rate of 21.7 percent per annum was heard this day at Lindsay


ON READING the Appellant's Factum, Appeal Book and Compendium, and Book of Authorities, and on hearing the submissions of counsel for the appellant, no one appearing for the respondents,


  1. THIS COURT ORDERS that the appeal is allowed.  The judgment of Selbie, D.J. in favour of the plaintiff for $6,664.75, costs of $335.00 and post-judgment interest at the Courts of Justice Act rate from February 14, 2012 is set aside.  Judgment shall issue for $6,664.75, costs of $335.00 and post-judgment interest at the contractual rate of 21.7 percent per annum from February 14, 2012.

  2. At the request of the appellant there is no order as to costs of this appeal.


The Honourable Drew S. Gunsolus


Transcribed by Michael Hui on Septmeber 22, 2015.  Original available below.

Capital One Bank v. Hussey

The Order of Justice Gunsoles arising from the appeal of the Small Claims Court decision in Capital One Bank (Canada Branch) v. Hussey

Contingency based collection means that payment for our work is contingent upon our success. If we are unsuccessful in our attempts to collect, you pay no fee.


Collectrite Credit Bureau Collections referred our office to the Christensen Law Firm after recovering $42,000 of a $140,000 delinquent debt owed to us by a commercial customer. Due to the poor results that we had in the past with paying lawyers by the hour, we were leaning towards writing off the remainder of the debt. Mr. Christensen put his money where his mouth is and offered to work on a contingency fee basis and charge only for upfront court costs. They assumed we were paying Mr. Christensen by the hour and would fold, but he was true to his word and didn’t charge any hourly fees; just a percentage of what he recovered. Mr. Christensen first won a motion for summary judgment on our behalf in Superior Court. Christensen Law Firm recovered $117,000 on our original debt of $98,000. Using Christensen Law Firm not only obtained the money that was owing to us; but it also gave us the satisfaction to see someone who had lied to us, cheated us and made false accusations against us; be held accountable and proven wrong in court.

- Tom Smith, Registered Insurance Broker, John F. Smith Insurance Brokers Ltd.